From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 20:13:27 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM Message-ID: <20030702181327.GO23578@dualathlon.random> References: <20030701022516.GL3040@dualathlon.random> <20030702171159.GG23578@dualathlon.random> <461030000.1057165809@flay> <20030702174700.GJ23578@dualathlon.random> <528080000.1057168362@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528080000.1057168362@flay> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Mel Gorman , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rik van Riel List-ID: On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:52:42AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Indeed - if we could memlock it, it'd be OK to drop that stuff. Would > make everything a lot simpler. yes. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org