From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 05:25:08 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM Message-ID: <20030701032508.GN3040@dualathlon.random> References: <20030701022516.GL3040@dualathlon.random> <20030630200237.473d5f82.akpm@digeo.com> <20030701032248.GM3040@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030701032248.GM3040@dualathlon.random> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: mel@csn.ul.ie, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:22:48AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > callers are fixed up to not require NOFAIL then we don't need it any more. > > Agreed indeed. I also found one argument in favour of NOFAIL: now it'll be easier to find all the deadlocking places ;) Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org