From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] My research agenda for 2.7
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:10:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030625011031.GP26348@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306250307.18291.phillips@arcor.de>
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Per struct address_space? This is an unnecessary limitation.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> It's a sensible limitation, it keeps the radix tree lookup simple.
It severely limits its usefulness. Dropping in a more flexible data
structure should be fine.
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This gives me the same data structure proliferation chills as bh's.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> It's not nearly as bad. There is no distinction between subpage and base
> struct page for almost all page operations, e.g., locking, IO, data access.
But those are code sanitation issues. You need to make sure this
doesn't explode on PAE.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-25 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-24 23:11 Daniel Phillips
2003-06-25 0:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-25 1:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-25 1:10 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-06-25 1:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-25 1:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-25 9:29 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-26 19:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-26 20:01 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-26 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-27 0:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-27 13:00 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-27 14:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-27 14:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-27 15:04 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 15:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-27 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-27 15:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-27 16:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-29 19:25 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-28 21:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-29 21:26 ` Mel Gorman
2003-06-28 21:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-29 22:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-28 23:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-02 21:10 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-03 2:04 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-03 2:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030625011031.GP26348@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox