From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 08:54:40 +0200 Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related Message-ID: <20030508065440.GA1890@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <3EB8E4CC.8010409@aitel.hist.no> <20030507.025626.10317747.davem@redhat.com> <20030507144100.GD8978@holomorphy.com> <20030507.064010.42794250.davem@redhat.com> <20030507215430.GA1109@hh.idb.hist.no> <20030508013854.GW8931@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508013854.GW8931@holomorphy.com> From: Helge Hafting Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III , Helge Hafting , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@digeo.com List-ID: On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:38:54PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: [...] > Can you try one kernel with the netfilter cset backed out, and another > with the re-slabification patch backed out? (But not with both backed > out simultaneously). I'm compiling without reslabify now. I got patching file arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 67 (offset 9 lines). when backing it out - is this the effect of some other patch touching the same file or could my source be wrong somehow? Which patch is the netfilter cset? None of the patches in mm2 looked obvious to me. Or is it part of the linus patch? Note that mm1 works for me, so anything found there too isn't as likely to be the problem. Helge Hafting -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org