From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 18:38:54 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related Message-ID: <20030508013854.GW8931@holomorphy.com> References: <3EB8E4CC.8010409@aitel.hist.no> <20030507.025626.10317747.davem@redhat.com> <20030507144100.GD8978@holomorphy.com> <20030507.064010.42794250.davem@redhat.com> <20030507215430.GA1109@hh.idb.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030507215430.GA1109@hh.idb.hist.no> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Helge Hafting Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@digeo.com List-ID: On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:40:10AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: >> Good point, Helge what netfilter stuff do you have in use? >> Are you doing NAT? On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:54:30PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > I have compiled in almost everything from netfilter, except > from "Amanda backup protocol support" and "NAT of local connections" > I also have ipv6 compiled, but no ipv6-netfilter. > I don't do any NAT. I used to have some firewall rules, but not currently > as some previous dev-kernel broke on that. So I have iptables > with no rules, just an ACCEPT policy for everything. I do no > routing either, only one network card is used. Can you try one kernel with the netfilter cset backed out, and another with the re-slabification patch backed out? (But not with both backed out simultaneously). Thanks. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org