From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 07:41:00 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related Message-ID: <20030507144100.GD8978@holomorphy.com> References: <3EB8DBA0.7020305@aitel.hist.no> <1052304024.9817.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> <3EB8E4CC.8010409@aitel.hist.no> <20030507.025626.10317747.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030507.025626.10317747.davem@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org From: Helge Hafting Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 12:49:48 +0200 Return-Path: To: "David S. Miller" Cc: helgehaf@aitel.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@digeo.com List-ID: > No, I compile everything into a monolithic kernel. > I don't even enable module support. On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 02:56:26AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Andrew, color me stumped. mm2/linux.patch doesn't have anything > really interesting in the networking. Maybe it's something in > the SLAB and/or pgd/pmg re-slabification changes? The i810 bits would be a failure case of the original slabification. At first glance the re-slabification doesn't seem to conflict with the unmapping-based slab poisoning. In another thread, you mentioned that a certain netfilter cset had issues; I think it might be good to add that as a second possible cause. I'm trying to track down testers with i810's to reproduce the issue, but the usual suspects and helpers aren't awake yet (most/all of my target systems are headless, though I regularly abuse my laptop, which appears to S3/Savage -based and so isn't useful for this). -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org