From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 04:53:07 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm4 Message-ID: <20030503025307.GB1541@averell> References: <20030502020149.1ec3e54f.akpm@digeo.com> <1051905879.2166.34.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502133405.57207c48.akpm@digeo.com> <1051908541.2166.40.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502140508.02d13449.akpm@digeo.com> <1051910420.2166.55.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502164159.4434e5f1.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030502164159.4434e5f1.akpm@digeo.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Matt Bernstein , Andi Kleen , elenstev@mesatop.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 01:41:59AM +0200, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matt Bernstein wrote: > > > > On May 2 Steven Cole wrote: > > > > >Here is a snippet from dmesg output for a successful kexec e100 boot: > > > > Bizarrely I have a nasty crash on modprobing e100 *without* kexec (having > > previously modprobed unix, af_packet and mii) and then trying to modprobe > > serio (which then deadlocks the machine). > > > > http://www.dcs.qmul.ac.uk/~mb/oops/ > > > > Andi, it died in the middle of modprobe->apply_alternatives() The important part of the oops - the first lines are missing in the .png. What is the failing address? And can you send me your e100.o ? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org