From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:33:37 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2 Message-Id: <20030319163337.602160d8.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <1048111359.1807.13.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> References: <20030319012115.466970fd.akpm@digeo.com> <1048103489.1962.87.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030319121055.685b9b8c.akpm@digeo.com> <1048107434.1743.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <1048111359.1807.13.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: elenstev@mesatop.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: "Steven P. Cole" wrote: > > > > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests > > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired. > > Replying to myself for a followup, > > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation > was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to > desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on > reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench > clients greater than 16. OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this: Does reverting http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch help? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org