From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:13:56 +0000 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: 2.5.60-mm2 Message-ID: <20030214101356.GA17155@codemonkey.org.uk> References: <20030214013144.2d94a9c5.akpm@digeo.com> <20030214093856.GC13845@codemonkey.org.uk> <20030214015802.66800166.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030214015802.66800166.akpm@digeo.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:58:02AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I'm puzzled that you've had NFS stable enough to test these. > This was just writing out a single 400 megabyte file with `dd'. I didn't try > anything fancier. ok. Can you hold off pushing NFS bits to Linus until this gets pinned down ? I really don't want to introduce any more variables to this, especially when its so hard to pin down to an exact replication scenario. Trond thinks this could be not just NFS related but something lurking deeper within net/ which could be even more annoying to pin down, though I don't see any other odd network related behaviour. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org