From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:52:39 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [PATCH] early, early ioremap Message-ID: <20030213135239.B22719@redhat.com> References: <3E4B4F36.70209@us.ibm.com> <18530000.1045160770@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18530000.1045160770@[10.10.2.4]>; from mbligh@aracnet.com on Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:26:12AM -0800 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:26:12AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Either a per-page bitmap of used areas, a fixmap-type array, or simply > making the user keep track of it would be fine ... > > Opinions? Why not use an early kmap_atomic()? It's easy enough to enable the code on a non-highmem build as you would need for this purpose. Also, making atomic kmaps able to map io space could be useful to replace ACPI's kludge too. -ben -- Don't email: aart@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org