linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Amol Kumar Lad <amolk@ishoni.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: running 2.4.2 kernel under 4MB Ram
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:13:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021026101310.A16359@bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035301164.31917.78.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 01:31, Amol Kumar Lad wrote:
> > It means that I _cannot_ run 2.4.2 on a 4MB box. 
> > Actually my embedded system already has 2.4.2 running on a 16Mb. I was
> > looking for a way to run it in 4Mb. 
> > So Is upgrade to 2.4.19 the only option ??
> 
> You should move to a later kernel anyway 2.4.2 has a lot of bugs
> including some security ones.

If the "embedded system" just brews his coffee, then there are not
many security issues he cares about. It gets the job done. 

Amol, Just add a "mem=4M" to the kernel commandline and see what 
happens. It depends a lot on what and how many applications you run
on that system. 

But still, Alan is right. You might run into odd problems that are
simply fixed if you upgrade. (My workstation was "pretty good" at 
staying up under 2.4.2 (about a month at a time), and I didn't want 
to upgrade, for fear of it getting worse. I upgraded and now get
much better uptimes (until my colleague types "reboot -n -f" into 
the wrong window)). 

		Roger.	

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience *
* excursions from the stable situation. We are currently in such an      * 
* excursion: The stable situation does not include humans. ***************
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-26  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-22 18:54 Amol Kumar Lad
2002-10-22  9:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-22 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-23  0:31   ` Amol Kumar Lad
2002-10-22 15:39     ` Alan Cox
2002-10-26  8:13       ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2002-10-22 16:04     ` jbradford
2002-10-22 11:03 ` jbradford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021026101310.A16359@bitwizard.nl \
    --to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=amolk@ishoni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox