From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:29:43 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch Message-ID: <20021022152943.J20957@redhat.com> References: <20021022145510.H20957@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from gh@us.ibm.com on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:27:57PM -0700 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Gerrit Huizenga Cc: Alan Cox , "Martin J. Bligh" , Rik van Riel , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bill Davidsen , Dave McCracken , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List-ID: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:27:57PM -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > That would be fine with me - we are only planning on people using > flags to shm*() or mmap(), not on the syscalls. I thought Oracle > was the one heavily dependent on the icky syscalls. You mean the wonderfully untested calls that never worked? At least they'd tested and used Ingo's 2.4 based patches that made shmfs use 4MB pages. -ben -- "Do you seek knowledge in time travel?" -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/