From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:40:23 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Message-ID: <20021015014023.GO4488@holomorphy.com> References: <20021015012015.GN4488@holomorphy.com> <2008756258.1034620187@[10.10.2.3]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2008756258.1034620187@[10.10.2.3]> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: john stultz , Matt , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum List-ID: At some point in the past, I wrote: >> I thought zholes stuff freed the struct pages. Maybe that was done >> by hand. On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:29:49PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > The only place I see that used in generic code is > calculate_zone_totalpages, free_area_init_core, free_area_init_node, > none of which seem to do that. But cscope might be borked again, I > guess. Must be done in each arch if at all ... which arch did you > think did it? Not sure, ISTR something about this going on but I don't see any extant examples. At any rate, it should be easy to do it by hand, just make sure there are struct pages tracking the holes in mem_map and free the space in mem_map that would track the holes. Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/