From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:52:36 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.5.42-mm2 Message-ID: <20021013195236.GC27878@holomorphy.com> References: <3DA7C3A5.98FCC13E@digeo.com> <20021013101949.GB2032@holomorphy.com> <3DA9B1A7.A747ADD6@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DA9B1A7.A747ADD6@digeo.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> @@ -1104,6 +1126,7 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(s >> pcp->low = 0; >> pcp->high = 32; >> pcp->batch = 16; >> + pcp->reserved = 0; >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcp->list); >> } >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->active_list); On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:47:19AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > OK. But that's been there since 2.5.40-mm2. Why did it suddenly > bite? I must have been way too tired or something: (1) It's embedded in struct zone, hence bootmem allocated, hence already zeroed. (2) The logs still show the show_free_areas() call immediately after free_all_bootmem_core() seeing the garbage ->reserved values. Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/