From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:32:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020909233211.GI18800@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209091953550.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Ideally some distinction would be nice, even if only to distinguish I/O
>> demanded to be done directly by the workload from background writeback
>> and/or readahead.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:54:29PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> OK, are we talking about page replacement or does queue scanning
> have priority over the quality of page replacement ? ;)
This is relatively tangential. The concern expressed has more to do
with VM writeback starving workload-issued I/O than page replacement.
Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-09 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-15 14:24 Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 9:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 11:40 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-09-09 17:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-09 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 13:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 19:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 19:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 20:03 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 21:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 22:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-10 0:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 22:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-09 22:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 23:32 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-09-09 23:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 22:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 23:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-10 0:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-10 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-10 1:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10 2:02 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020909233211.GI18800@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox