From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:10:41 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5 Message-ID: <20020909171041.GF18800@holomorphy.com> References: <3D7C6C0A.1BBEBB2D@digeo.com> <200209090740.16942.tomlins@cam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209090740.16942.tomlins@cam.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ed Tomlinson Cc: Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:40:16AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Second item. Do you run gkrelmon when doing your tests? If not please > install it and watch it slowly start to eat resources. This morning (uptime > Think we have something we can improve here. I have inclued an strace > of one (and a bit) update cycle. > This was with 33-mm5 with your varient of slabasap. strace -r to get relative timestamps. I've seen some issues where tasks suck progressively more cpu over time and the box gets unusable, leading most notably to 30+s or longer fork/exit latencies. Still on idea what's going wrong when it does, though. Cheers, Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/