From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.33-mm1
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 22:55:43 -0400
References: <3D7437AC.74EAE22B@zip.com.au> <3D755E2D.7A6D55C6@zip.com.au> <20020904011503.GT888@holomorphy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020904011503.GT888@holomorphy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200209032255.43198.tomlins@cam.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

On September 3, 2002 09:15 pm, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>

What are the numbers telling you?  Is you test faster or slower
with slablru?  Does it page more or less?  Is looking at the number
of objects the way to determine if slablru is helping?  I submit
the paging and runtimes are much better indications?  What do
story do they tell?

Thanks
Ed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/