linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: MM patches against 2.5.31
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:28:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020822112806.28099.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D644C70.6D100EA5@zip.com.au>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:29:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> I've uploaded a rollup of pending fixes and feature work
> against 2.5.31 to
> 
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.31/2.5.31-mm1/
> 
> The rolled up patch there is suitable for ongoing testing and
> development.  The individual patches are in the broken-out/
> directory and should all be documented.

Sorry, but we still have the page release race in multiple places.
Look at the following (page starts with page_count == 1):

Processor 1                          Processor 2
refill_inactive: lines 378-395
   as page count == 1 we'll
   continue with line 401

                                     __pagevec_release: line 138
				       calls release_pages
				     release_pages: line 100-111
				       put_page_test_zero brings the
				       page count to 0 and we'll continue
				       at line 114. Note that this may
				       happen while another processor holds
				       the lru lock, i.e. there is no
				       point in checking for page count == 0
				       with the lru lock held because
				       the lru lock doesn't protect against
				       decrements of page count after
				       the check.
  line 401: page_cache_get
  resurrects the page, page
  count is now 1.
  lines 402-448.
  line 448 calls __pagevec_release

__pagevec_release: line 138
  calls release_pages
release_pages: lines 100-111
  put_page_test_zero brings the
  page count back to 0 (!!!)
  i.e. we continue at line 114:

  lines 114-123.
  The page count == 0 check in line
  123 is successful and the page
  is returned to the buddy allocator
  
				       lines 114-123.
				       The page count == 0 check in line
				       123 is successful, i.e. the page
				       is returned to the buddy allocator
				       a second time. ===> BOOM


Neither the lru lock nor any of the page count == 0 checks can
prevent this from happening.

    regards   Christian

-- 
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-22 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-22  2:29 Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 11:28 ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2002-08-26  1:52   ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  9:10     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 14:22       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 15:29         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 17:56           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:24             ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 19:34               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:48               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27  9:22               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 19:19                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 20:00             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 20:09               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 20:58                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 16:48                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 13:14                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-28 17:18                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 17:42                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 20:41                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 21:03                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:04                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 22:39                             ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:57                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 21:31                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27  3:42                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-27  4:37                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 15:59 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-22 16:06   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-22 19:45     ` Steven Cole
2002-08-26  2:15     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  2:08       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-26  2:32         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  3:06           ` Steven Cole
2002-08-26 22:09 Ed Tomlinson
2002-08-26 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27  0:13   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020822112806.28099.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de \
    --to=ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox