linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: akpm@zip.com.au
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rohit.seth@intel.com, sunil.saxena@intel.com,
	asit.k.mallick@intel.com
Subject: Re: large page patch
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:43:01 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020801.174301.123634127.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D49D45A.D68CCFB4@zip.com.au>

   Some observations which have been made thus far:
   
   - Minimal impact on the VM and MM layers
   
Well the downside of this is that it means it isn't transparent
to userspace.  For example, specfp2000 results aren't going to
improve after installing these changes.  Some of the other large
page implementations would.

   - The change to MAX_ORDER is unneeded
   
This is probably done to increase the likelyhood that 4MB page orders
are available.  If we collapse 4MB pages deeper, they are less likely
to be broken up because smaller orders would be selected first.

Maybe it doesn't make a difference....

   - swapping of large pages and making them pagecache-coherent is
     unpopular.
   
Swapping them is easy, any time you hit a large PTE you unlarge it.
This is what some of other large page implementations do.  Basically
the implementation is that set_pte() breaks apart large ptes when
necessary.

I agree on the pagecache side.

Actually to be honest the other implementations seemed less
intrusive and easier to add support for.  The downside is that
handling of weird cases like x86 using pmd's for 4MB pages
was not complete last time I checked.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-02  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-02  0:37 Andrew Morton
2002-08-02  0:43 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-08-02  1:26   ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-02  1:19     ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02  1:55   ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-02  1:50     ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02  2:29     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-08-02  2:23       ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02  2:53         ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-08-02  5:24       ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02  5:20         ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02  6:26           ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02  6:33             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-02  6:44               ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02 10:00                 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-02  7:08               ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-02  7:15                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-02  8:20             ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02  9:05               ` Ryan Cumming
2002-08-02  9:06                 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-02 12:52                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-02 15:27               ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02  1:09 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-02  1:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-02  4:31   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-02  4:47     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-02  3:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-02 23:40 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-08-02  1:34 Seth, Rohit
2002-08-02 19:31 Seth, Rohit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020801.174301.123634127.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
    --cc=sunil.saxena@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox