From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:09:46 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [PATCH] for_each_pgdat Message-ID: <20020720230946.GH1096@holomorphy.com> References: <1027201039.1085.812.camel@sinai> <244469929.1027180137@[10.10.2.3]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <244469929.1027180137@[10.10.2.3]> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Robert Love , Linus Torvalds , akpm@zip.com.au, riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: At some point in the past, Robert Love wrote: >> If Bill wants to convert pgdats to lists that is fine but is another >> step. Let's get in this first batch and that can be done off this. On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > As we now reference them in only two places (the macro defn and > numa.c:_alloc_pages) it hardly seems worth converting to lists ... ? > (I'm going to take an axe to NUMA _alloc_pages in a minute anyway ;-)) I won't stand in the way of any of this, the list.h sort-of suggestion was merely part of questioning the pgdat_next change. In fact, it was meant more to point out what you just did, that the iterator takes the field out of direct usage except for a couple of places. I'll stand behind these changes as they are now. Cheers, Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/