From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] iowait statistics
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 11:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020515184646.GH27957@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205151533060.32261-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:33:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Well, with the amount of memory you have in the machine
> I expect the time spent in idle and iowait to be fairly
> limited during a repetitive kernel compile ;)
> If everything "looks" normal in top and vmstat things
> should be ok.
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:33:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
$ vmstat 1
procs memory swap io system cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
17 0 0 0 182880 32364 55180 0 0 2 77 29 229 84 6 10
17 0 0 0 178840 32380 55268 0 0 0 1240 169 766 95 5 0
16 0 0 0 168056 32380 55480 0 0 0 0 104 829 95 5 0
20 0 0 0 197960 32380 55616 0 0 0 0 105 1156 94 6 0
16 0 0 0 179416 32380 55632 0 0 0 0 108 994 95 5 0
18 0 0 0 184428 32380 55692 0 0 0 0 109 954 94 6 0
16 0 0 0 165684 32396 55720 0 0 0 1148 182 1069 96 4 0
17 0 0 0 155572 32396 55732 0 0 0 0 104 854 96 4 0
17 0 0 0 181108 32400 56636 0 0 0 0 104 853 95 5 0
18 0 0 0 194772 32400 56692 0 0 0 0 103 955 94 6 0
16 0 0 0 185068 32400 56856 0 0 0 0 104 1006 95 5 0
18 1 0 0 191744 32408 56972 0 0 0 1808 286 1062 95 5 0
16 0 0 0 202512 32408 57092 0 0 0 0 103 956 94 6 0
17 0 0 0 191116 32408 57140 0 0 0 0 103 1143 91 9 0
17 0 0 0 202032 32408 57288 0 0 0 0 103 899 93 7 0
17 0 0 0 187764 32408 57320 0 0 0 0 103 928 92 8 0
18 1 0 0 198048 32408 57400 0 0 0 1776 294 1026 94 6 0
16 1 0 0 205108 32408 57436 0 0 0 0 104 842 96 4 0
16 0 0 0 181964 32408 57488 0 0 0 0 103 1028 95 5 0
16 0 0 0 175224 32408 57524 0 0 0 0 104 961 95 5 0
All good there. OTOH:
$ top
fscanf failed on /proc/stat for cpu 1
fscanf failed on /proc/stat for cpu 2
fscanf failed on /proc/stat for cpu 3
... and it proceeds thus:
11:45am up 2:00, 4 users, load average: 17.18, 16.86, 16.94
52 processes: 50 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 72.2% user, 27.1% system, 0.0% nice, 0.2% idle
fscanf failed on /proc/stat for cpu 1
Mem: 499088K av, 174936K used, 324152K free, 0K shrd, 32684K buff
Swap: 1052248K av, 0K used, 1052248K free 61812K cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
26200 wli 25 0 13780 13M 2204 R 10.0 2.7 0:01 cc1
26246 wli 15 0 1060 1060 804 R 0.1 0.2 0:00 top
1 root 15 0 492 492 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 init
2 root 0K 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 migration_CPU0
3 root 0K 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 migration_CPU1
4 root 0K 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 migration_CPU2
5 root 0K 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 migration_CPU3
6 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd
7 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0
8 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU1
9 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU2
10 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU3
11 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd
12 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 pdflush
... i.e. a little bit of recurring fscanf stuff.
Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-15 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 1:19 Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-14 12:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 17:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 7:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-14 15:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-14 16:36 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 16:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 17:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 20:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 16:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 16:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 17:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 18:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:33 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 18:46 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-05-15 19:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-16 11:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 9:49 ` Leigh Brown
2002-05-16 14:51 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-16 16:44 ` Leigh Brown
2002-05-17 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-16 11:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 15:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-16 10:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-14 18:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-15 1:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 1:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 14:39 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020515184646.GH27957@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox