From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:47:50 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway? Message-ID: <20020507194750.GV15756@holomorphy.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Christian Smith , Rik van Riel , Joseph A Knapka , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tuesday 07 May 2002 20:37, Christian Smith wrote: >> - do_page_fault() is definately in the wrong place, or at least, the work >> it does (it finds the generic vma of the fault. This should be generic >> code.) On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > It's per-arch because different architectures have very different sets of > conditions that have to be handled. If you like, you can try to break out > some cross-arch factors and make them into inlines or something. That's > cleanup work that's hard and mostly thankless. We need more gluttons for > punishment^W^W^W volunteers to tackle this kind of thing. I believe I'm already signed up for this, or at least I'm putting down code on this front. Cheers, Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/