linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Vivian Wang <vivianwang@tcindex.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: memory exhausted
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:38:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020427203854.GR26092@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CCAFC69.8090306@zytor.com>

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This is larger than the virtual address space of i386 machines,
>> but not larger than the physical address space. In principle, an
>> executive taking advantage of 36-bit physical addressing extensions and
>> performing its own memory management on the bare metal could perform an
>> in-core sort on a 36-bit physical addressing -capable 32-bit machine,
>> e.g. i386-style PAE/highmem machines and some 32-bit MIPS machines. A
>> kernel module could also in principle take advantage of the kernel's
>> low-level memory management facilities to perform such an in-core sort.
>> While possible, this is absolutely not recommended.


On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 12:30:49PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Good God, I hope x86-64 catches on soon and kills off this PAE silliness...
> 	-hpa


Taunting me, eh? =)

Well, I did say "absolutely not recommended". 64-bit hardware of
whatever kind is without question a more appropriate solution to these
kinds of issues than such shenanigans anyway, and at this point I'm
more or less sorry I brought that up. And I'll leave the discussion
of what specific lines of hardware are most suitable for other fora. =)


Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-27 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5.1.0.14.2.20020424145006.00b17cb0@notes.tcindex.com>
2002-04-25  2:19 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-25  2:57   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-25  4:21     ` msimons
2002-04-27 19:30     ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-27 20:38       ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-04-27 20:52         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020427203854.GR26092@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=vivianwang@tcindex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox