linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mmap bug with drivers that adjust vm_start
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:57:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020326135703.B25375@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020326174236.B13052@dualathlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:42:36PM +0100

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:42:36PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> However if the patch is needed it means the ->mmap also must do the
> do_munmap stuff by hand internally, which is very ugly given we also did
> our own do_munmap in a completly different region (the one requested by
> the user).

At least my own code checks for that and fails if there is a mapping 
already placed at the fixed address it needs to use.  If we're paranoid, 
we could BUG() on getting a vma back from the new find_vma_prepare call.

> Our do_munmap should not happen if we place the mapping
> elsewhere. If possible I would prefer to change those drivers to
> advertise their enforced vm_start with a proper callback, the current
> way is halfway broken still. BTW, which are those drivers, and why they
> needs to enforce a certain vm_start (also despite MAP_FIXED that they
> cannot check within the ->mmap callback)?

Video drivers, others that require specific alignment (4MB pages for 
example).  Historically, the mmap call has been the hook for doing this, 
hence the comment in do_mmap from davem.  Unless there's a really good 
reason for changing the hook, I don't see doing so as providing much 
benefit other than making source compatibility hard.

		-ben
-- 
"A man with a bass just walked in,
 and he's putting it down
 on the floor."
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-26 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-26  4:00 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-03-26  4:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-26 16:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-26 18:57   ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-03-26 19:15     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-26 20:43       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-03-26 21:18         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020326135703.B25375@redhat.com \
    --to=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox