From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:21:10 +0000 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated version of radix-tree pagecache Message-ID: <20020111232110.A260@toy.ucw.cz> References: <20020105171234.A25383@caldera.de> <3C3972D4.56F4A1E2@loewe-komp.de> <20020107030344.H10391@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020107030344.H10391@holomorphy.com>; from wli@holomorphy.com on Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:03:44AM -0800 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III , Peter W?chtler , Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , velco@fadata.bg List-ID: Hi! > I speculate this would be good for small systems as well as it reduces > the size of struct page by 2*sizeof(unsigned long) bytes, allowing more > incremental allocation of pagecache metadata. I haven't tried it on my > smaller systems yet (due to lack of disk space and needing to build the > cross-toolchains), though I'm now curious as to its exact behavior there. Why not mem=8M, nosmp on your "big" system? Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/