linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Giuliano Pochini <pochini@denise.shiny.it>
Cc: zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 22:05:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011027220557.A20280@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BDAB344.CE25D5D@denise.shiny.it>

On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 03:14:44PM +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> 
> > block: 1024 slots per queue, batch=341
> > 
> > Wrote 600.00 MB in 71 seconds -> 8.39 MB/s (7.5 %CPU)
> > 
> > Still very spiky, and during the write disk is uncapable of doing any
> > reads. IOW, no serious application can be started before writing has
> > finished. Shouldn't we favour reads over writes? Or is it just that
> > the elevator is not doing its job right, so reads suffer?
> >
> >    procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
> >  r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
> >  0  1  1      0   3596    424 453416   0   0     0 40468  189   508   2   2  96
> 
> 341*127K = ~40M.
> 
> Batch is too high. It doesn't explain why reads get delayed so much, anyway.
> 

Try modifying the elivator queue length with elvtune.

BTW, 2.2.19 has the queue lengths in the hundreds, and 2.4.xx has it in the
thousands.  I've set 2.4 kernels back to the 2.2 defaults, and interactive
performance has gone up considerably.  These are subjective tests though.

Mike

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-28  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-24 10:42 Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-24 14:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-10-25  0:25   ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-25  4:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25  4:57       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25 12:48         ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-25 16:31           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-25 17:33             ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26  9:45             ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 10:08             ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 14:39               ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26 14:57                 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-26 15:01                   ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-26 16:04                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 16:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 17:19                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 17:30                       ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-28 17:34                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 17:48                           ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 17:59                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 18:22                               ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 18:46                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-28 19:29                                   ` Alan Cox
2001-10-28 18:56                               ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-30  8:56                               ` Jens Axboe
2001-10-30  9:26                                 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-10-28 19:13                         ` Barry K. Nathan
2001-10-28 21:42                           ` Jonathan Morton
2001-11-02  5:52                         ` Zlatko's I/O slowdown status Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 20:14                           ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-11-02 20:26                             ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-02 21:22                               ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-11-02 20:57                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 23:23                             ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-27 13:14               ` xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically Giuliano Pochini
2001-10-28  5:05                 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-10-25  9:07       ` Zlatko Calusic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011027220557.A20280@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=pochini@denise.shiny.it \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox