From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 19:04:49 -0700 Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Message-ID: <20011009190449.A25261@gnuppy> References: <1002670160.862.15.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1002670160.862.15.camel@phantasy> From: Bill Huey Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Robert Love Cc: Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org, kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:29:13PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > For example, starting a `dbench 16' would sometimes cause a brief stall > (especially if it is the second run of dbench). It's better now, but > still not perfect. The VM holds a lot of locks for a long time. > > Good work. I hope Alan sees it soon. Yeah, but overall the performance of his recent patch is pretty amazing. It's really good that Linux is finally getting a VM that behaves well and can keep the working set in memory without heavy IO activity flushing out critical process pages. The performance of Riel's VM system should hold for server activity too. And adding something like thrash control to help make sure aging still works (without statistical scattering) under heavy load should allow Riel's VM to progress under loads that would freeze previous VMs. ;-) bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/