From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <20010925005033.A137@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:50:34 +0200 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Alan Cox on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:04:10PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Alan Cox , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Daniel Phillips , Rob Fuller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Hi! > > So my suggestion was to look at getting anonymous pages backed by what > > amounts to a shared memory segment. In that vein. By using an extent > > based data structure we can get the cost down under the current 8 bits > > per page that we have for the swap counts, and make allocating swap > > pages faster. And we want to cluster related swap pages anyway so > > an extent based system is a natural fit. > > Much of this goes away if you get rid of both the swap and anonymous page > special cases. Back anonymous pages with the "whoops everything I write here > vanishes mysteriously" file system and swap with a swapfs What exactly is anonymous memory? I thought it is what you do when you want to malloc(), but you want to back that up by swap, not /dev/null. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/