From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
To: Arjan Filius <iafilius@xs4all.nl>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [SMP lock BUG?] Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:58:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200109082102.f88L2vo18714@mailb.telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109081920540.3542-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
Hi,
This is interesting. [Assumes UP Athlon - correct]
Note that all BUGs out in highmem.h:95 (kmap_atomic)
and that test is only on if you have enabled HIGHMEM_DEBUG
[my analyze is done with a 2.4.10-pre2 kernel, but I checked with
later patches and I do not think they fix it either...]
The preemptive kernel puts more SMP stress on the kernel than
running with multiple CPUs.
So this might be a potential bug in the kernel proper, running with
a SMP computer.
If I understand the bug correctly, a process gets a page fault.
Starts to map in the page. But before the final part it checks -
and the page is already there!!! Correct?
On Saturday den 8 September 2001 19:33, Arjan Filius wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
>
> I tried 2.4.10-pre4 with patch-rml-2.4.10-pre4-preempt-kernel-1.
> But it seems to hit highmem (see below) (i do have 1.5GB ram)
> 2.4.10-pre4 plain runs just fine.
>
> With the kernel option mem=850M the patched kernel boots an seems to run
> fine. However i didn't do any stress testing yet, but i still notice
> hickups while playing mp3 files at -10 nice level with mpg123 on a 1.1GHz
> Athlon, and removing for example a _large_ file (reiser-on-lvm).
>
> My syslog output with highmem:
>
> Sep 8 18:10:16 sjoerd kernel: kernel BUG at
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.10-pre4/include/asm/highmem.h:95! Sep 8 18:10:16 sjoerd
> kernel: invalid operand: 0000
> Sep 8 18:10:16 sjoerd kernel: CPU: 0
> Sep 8 18:10:16 sjoerd kernel: EIP: 0010:[do_wp_page+636/1088]
> [- - -]
> sjoerd kernel: Call Trace: [handle_mm_fault+141/224]
> [do_page_fault+375/1136] [do_page_fault+0/1136] [__mmdrop+58/64]
> [do_exit+595/640] Sep 8 18:10:16 sjoerd kernel: [error_code+52/64]
Lets look at this example. You need to add some inline functions...
handle_mm_fault
takes the mm->page_table_lock [this should prevent reschedules]
allocs pmd
allocs pte
handle_pte_fault(...)
handle_pte_fault [inline, most likely path]
pte is present
it is a write access
but the pte is not writeable - call do_wp_page
do_wp_page
plays some games with the lock...
finally calls copy_cow_page [inline] with the page_table_lock
UNLOCKED!
copy_cow_page
calls clear_user_highpage or copy_user_highpage
both clear_user_highpage and copy_user_highpage
calls kmap_atomic
kmap_atomic
page is a highmem page
but during the time this process was unlocked some other
thread has allocated the page in question... BUG out.
So somewere between the UNLOCK (might be a lot later) and the
BUG test in kmap_atomic the process running in kernel got preempted.
(most likely during the page copy since it will take some time)
Another process (thread) started to run - hit the same page fault
but succeeded in its alloc.
Back to the first process it continues, finally checks - the page
is there... and BUGS.
Note that this can happen in a pure SMP kernel.
But let the processes (threads) run on two CPUs. And let the
first get an interrupt/bh after unlock - the other can pass
and add the page before the first one can continue - same
result!
/RogerL
--
Roger Larsson
Skelleftea
Sweden
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-08 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109081920540.3542-100000@sjoerd.sjoerdnet>
2001-09-08 20:58 ` Roger Larsson [this message]
2001-09-08 22:18 ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 14:55 ` george anzinger
2001-09-09 22:25 ` Arjan Filius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200109082102.f88L2vo18714@mailb.telia.com \
--to=roger.larsson@norran.net \
--cc=iafilius@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox