From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 22:08:58 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/meminfo (fwd) Message-ID: <20010905220858.A11329@athlon.random> References: <20010905214552.B32584@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from bcrl@redhat.com on Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:00:28PM -0400 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ben LaHaise Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven List-ID: On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:00:28PM -0400, Ben LaHaise wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > I fixed such bug ages ago: > > > > ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.10pre4aa1/00_meminfo-wraparound-2 > > Is it scheduled for merging? Arjan mentioned that it may have broken some I don't remeber if I've sent it to Linus or not yet but yes. > apps (like top) and have been pulled earlier. My vote is for letting them never got a bugreport about it so I guess top should be ok but if top breaks it is the one that has to be fixed so... > break and get fixed on highmem machines, but other people might have > different opinions. I certainly agree with you. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/