From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Chris Blizzard <blizzard@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: resend Re: [PATCH] final merging patch -- significant mozilla speedup.
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 02:53:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010819025314.R1719@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010819023548.P1719@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 02:35:48AM +0200
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 02:35:48AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> For the vm_pgoff I need to think more about it (quite frankly I never
> thought about expand_stack(), I only thought about the swapper locking
> while doing the "odd" change), if it's a bug I will release a corrected
> mmap-rb-5 in a few hours. Thanks for raising this issue.
I don't think it's a bug so I don't feel the need to change it. The
expand_stack can only run with the semaphore acquired at worse in read
mode so it cannot race.
However now that you make me to think about this vm_pgoff field I'm
afraid I forgot to update it in the forward merging cases (in the new
code), luckily there are only a few forward merging cases that we have
to do (the backmerging are much more frequent) so it will be trivial to
fix it (and since I only merge anon mappings the bug seems only
theorical and this is probably why I couldn't notice it while doing the
regression testing [but I certainly agree to fix it even if it's
theorical]).
If I'm missing something let me know of course, thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-19 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-16 21:02 Ben LaHaise
2001-08-18 18:22 ` resend " Ben LaHaise
2001-08-18 23:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 0:10 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-19 0:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 0:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-19 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 1:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 0:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-08-19 1:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 1:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 1:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 2:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 3:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 5:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-19 0:54 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-19 1:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010819025314.R1719@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=blizzard@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox