From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] alternative way of calculating inactive_target Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:06:18 +0200 References: <200108160337.FAA11729@mailb.telia.com> <20010816084939Z16265-1231+1158@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <200108161250.f7GCo8w13004@mailc.telia.com> In-Reply-To: <200108161250.f7GCo8w13004@mailc.telia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010816135959Z16458-1231+1203@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roger Larsson , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: "Scott F. Kaplan" List-ID: On August 16, 2001 02:45 pm, Roger Larsson wrote: > On Thursday den 16 August 2001 10:55, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On August 16, 2001 05:33 am, Roger Larsson wrote: > > BTW, you left out an interesting detail: any performance measurements > > you've already done. > > I had not done many at that point in time - it was LATE, it did run... > etc... > Now I have some data. (but I had changed a limit too) > In the tests I have run the difference is nothing consistently better NOR > worse. Oh, hey, I think you need to apply this to the per-zone targets too, that's probably why you didn't see anything change. -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/