linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage"
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:08:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010807210803.C2476@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493160000.997215771@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:22:51PM -0400

On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:22:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:52:11 PM -0700 Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Chris Mason wrote:
> >> 
> >> Linus seemed pretty sure kswapd wasn't deadlocked, but though I would
> >> mention this anyway....
> > 
> > The thing that Leonard seems able to repeat pretty well is just doing a
> > "mke2fs" on a big partition. I don't think xfs is involved there at all.
> 
> It depends, mke2fs could be just another GFP_NOFS process waiting around
> for kswapd to free buffers.  If a journaled filesystem is there, and it is
> locking up kswapd, any heavy buffer allocator could make the problem seem
> worse.

mke2fs is a completely different case.  That's just a simple write
throttling problem --- mke2fs simply is doing a lot of disk writes to
a block device very quickly (zeroing out the inode table).  The kernel
shouldn't be allowing a user process to dirty so many buffers that VM
starts getting f*cked --- in the past mke2fs could actually cause the
OOM to start randomly killing processes.

There's a workaround which causes the problem to go away; if you
export the MKE2FS_SYNC environment variable and set it to a small
value (say, 5 or 10), then every 5 or 10 block groups, mke2fs will
call sync(), and this effectively acts as a write throttler.

I had considered making this the default, but this is such a great way
of demonstrating that a kernel has a write throttling problem that I
haven't done so, since it's effectively hiding a kernel VM bug.
(Simply writing to a block device shouldn't cause the OOM to trigger;
and since mke2fs is just doing block device writes, it's not a
GFP_NOFS case.)

(We seem to have a habit of repeatedly breaking write throttling; it
was broken for a while in 2.2, then it got fixed, then someone wanted
to "fix" the VM, and they would break write throttling again... and
again... and again....)

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-08  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-03 23:44 Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04  1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04  3:06   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04  3:13     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  3:23       ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04  3:35         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  3:26       ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04  3:34         ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04  3:38         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  3:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  4:14           ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04  4:20             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  4:39               ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04  4:47                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  5:13                   ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04  5:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  6:37                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04  5:38                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-04  7:13                         ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 23:28                           ` [PATCH] Unlazy activate (was: re "ongoing vm suckage") Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 14:22                       ` [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" Mike Black
2001-08-04 17:08                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 20:54                           ` Jonathan Morton
2001-08-05  4:19                           ` Michael Rothwell
2001-08-05 18:40                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-05 20:20                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-06 20:32                               ` Rob Landley
2001-08-05 15:24                           ` Mike Black
2001-08-05 20:04                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:23                               ` Alan Cox
2001-08-05 20:33                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 16:21                       ` Mark Hemment
2001-08-07 15:45                       ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 16:22                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 16:51                           ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 17:08                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 18:17                             ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-07 18:40                               ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 21:33                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 21:33                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:04                           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:11                             ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 19:12                               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 19:21                                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 20:50                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 23:36                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:26                             ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 18:13                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 18:40                                 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 19:52                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 20:22                                     ` Chris Mason
2001-08-08  1:08                                       ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2001-08-08  1:13                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-08  2:25                             ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010807210803.C2476@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox