From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage"
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:08:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010807210803.C2476@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493160000.997215771@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:22:51PM -0400
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:22:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:52:11 PM -0700 Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >> Linus seemed pretty sure kswapd wasn't deadlocked, but though I would
> >> mention this anyway....
> >
> > The thing that Leonard seems able to repeat pretty well is just doing a
> > "mke2fs" on a big partition. I don't think xfs is involved there at all.
>
> It depends, mke2fs could be just another GFP_NOFS process waiting around
> for kswapd to free buffers. If a journaled filesystem is there, and it is
> locking up kswapd, any heavy buffer allocator could make the problem seem
> worse.
mke2fs is a completely different case. That's just a simple write
throttling problem --- mke2fs simply is doing a lot of disk writes to
a block device very quickly (zeroing out the inode table). The kernel
shouldn't be allowing a user process to dirty so many buffers that VM
starts getting f*cked --- in the past mke2fs could actually cause the
OOM to start randomly killing processes.
There's a workaround which causes the problem to go away; if you
export the MKE2FS_SYNC environment variable and set it to a small
value (say, 5 or 10), then every 5 or 10 block groups, mke2fs will
call sync(), and this effectively acts as a write throttler.
I had considered making this the default, but this is such a great way
of demonstrating that a kernel has a write throttling problem that I
haven't done so, since it's effectively hiding a kernel VM bug.
(Simply writing to a block device shouldn't cause the OOM to trigger;
and since mke2fs is just doing block device writes, it's not a
GFP_NOFS case.)
(We seem to have a habit of repeatedly breaking write throttling; it
was broken for a while in 2.2, then it got fixed, then someone wanted
to "fix" the VM, and they would break write throttling again... and
again... and again....)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-08 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-03 23:44 Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:26 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 3:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:14 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:39 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 5:13 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 5:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 5:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-04 7:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 23:28 ` [PATCH] Unlazy activate (was: re "ongoing vm suckage") Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 14:22 ` [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" Mike Black
2001-08-04 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 20:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-08-05 4:19 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-08-05 18:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-05 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-06 20:32 ` Rob Landley
2001-08-05 15:24 ` Mike Black
2001-08-05 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-05 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 16:21 ` Mark Hemment
2001-08-07 15:45 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 16:51 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 18:17 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-07 18:40 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 19:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:26 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 18:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 18:40 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 20:22 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-08 1:08 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2001-08-08 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-08 2:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010807210803.C2476@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox