From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <20010323171716.28420@colin.muc.de> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:17:16 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Adding just a pinch of icache/dcache pressure... References: <20010323015358Z129164-406+3041@vger.kernel.org> <20010323122815.A6428@win.tue.nl> <3ABB6833.183E9188@mandrakesoft.com> <20010323111056.A9332@cs.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010323111056.A9332@cs.cmu.edu>; from Jan Harkes on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jan Harkes Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Jan Harkes wrote: > btw. There definitely is a network receive buffer leak somewhere in > either the 3c905C path or higher up in the network layers (2.4.0 or > 2.4.1). The normal path does not leak anything. What do you mean with "normal path" ? And are you sure it was a leak? TCP can buffer quite a bit of skbs, but it should be bounded based on the number of sockets. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/