linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@eDial.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.2.19pre3 and poor reponse to RT-scheduled processes?
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:45:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200012292045.PAA17190@ninigret.metatel.office> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

[...Please CC me on any replies, as I'm not on the list(s)...]

Folks:
	I was experiencing problems with 2.2.16 where the box would go out
	to lunch for a few seconds flushing buffer or paging at inopportune
	times (is there ever an opportune time for the box to become non-
	reponsive for 5 seconds? 8-).

	2.2.19pre3 makes the behaviour much better, but I still see ~ 2sec
	pauses at times.  I'm sending this to the MM list as well, since I
	believe the poor behaviour in 2.2.16 was an MM issue... I don't 
	know where the slowdowns are happening this time around.

	The box in question is running the linux-ha.org heartbeat package,
	which is a RT-scheduled, mlock()'ed process, and as such should
	get as good service as the box is able to mange.  Often, under
	high disk (and/or MM) loads, the box becomes unreponsive for a
	period of time from ~ 1 sec to a high of ~ 2.8sec.

	The test is simply running a 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/u1/big-empty-file
	bs=1k count=512000 && date'.  Generally, the box will sieze up around
	the same time as the the 'dd' finishes (maybe trying to exec date?).

	I'd appreciate any hints at how to reduce the non-reponsiveness 
	window down as much as possible.  I haven't yet looked to see if
	there is a version of the low-latency patches for 2.2.18 or 19pre,
	but I'd appreciate other ideas on tracking this down as well.

Thanks!
- --rafal

- ----
Rafal Boni                                               rafal.boni@eDial.com
 PGP key C7D3024C, print EA49 160D F5E4 C46A 9E91  524E 11E0 7133 C7D3 024C
    Need to get a hold of me?  http://800.eDial.com/rafal.boni@eDial.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999

iD8DBQE6TPfjEeBxM8fTAkwRAiPaAKDSp1udFSypqq838fwAjQnlFW0m2wCgtycm
xF7xuBroSl3YXCTqUXGDAy0=
=JHLL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-12-29 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-29 20:45 Rafal Boni [this message]
2000-12-29 21:19 ` Gregory Maxwell
2000-12-29 21:54   ` Rafal Boni
2000-12-30 18:16     ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200012292045.PAA17190@ninigret.metatel.office \
    --to=rafal.boni@edial.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox