From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14BeSV-0005GG-00 for linux-mm@kvack.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:55:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:55:11 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: __GFP_HIGH unused? Message-ID: <20001228145511.B19693@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: My trusty grep tells me that __GFP_HIGH is unused in the current 2.4.0-test12 tree. Will it ever come back? Or is GFP_ATOMIC being abused as a flag somewhere? If neither of these is true, am I right in saying there's no difference between GFP_USER and GFP_KERNEL? I was trying to amend the kernel-doc for kmalloc and started looking through some of this, but I'm a little lost. Things have changed a lot since the description I was working from in Rubini's _Linux Device Drivers_ (which covers 2.0). -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/