From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:20:10 -0700 Message-Id: <200010140020.RAA03611@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" In-reply-to: <20001013155750.B29761@twiddle.net> (message from Richard Henderson on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:57:50 -0700) Subject: Re: Updated Linux 2.4 Status/TODO List (from the ALS show) References: <20001013141723.C29525@twiddle.net> <20001013155750.B29761@twiddle.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: rth@twiddle.net Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, davej@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Either that or adjust how we do atomic operations. I can do 64-bit atomic widgetry, but not with the code as written. Ultra can do it as well, and as far as I understand it ia64 64-bit atomic_t's shouldn't be a problem either. I would suggest we make a atomic64_t or similar different type. The space savings from using 32-bit normal atomic_t in all other situations is of real value. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/