From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:46:23 +0200 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Message-ID: <20001010114623.C12032@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> References: <200010092207.PAA08714@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> <200010092313.e99NDQX173855@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200010092313.e99NDQX173855@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 07:13:25PM -0400 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: Jim Gettys , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Byron Stanoszek , MM mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > X, and any other big friendly processes, could participate in > memory balancing operations. X could be made to clean out a > font cache when the kernel signals that memory is low. When > the situation becomes serious, X could just mmap /dev/zero over > top of the background image. Haven't we already had this discussion? Quite a lot of programs have cached data (X fonts, Netscape (lots!)), GC-able data (Emacs, Java etc.), data that can simply be discarded (X window backing stores), or data that can be written to disk on demand (Netscape again). -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/