From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:23:51 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Message-ID: <20000928172351.O17518@athlon.random> References: <20000928165427.K17518@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:13:59PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rik van Riel , Christoph Rohland , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Linus Torvalds , Roger Larsson , MM mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Can anyone see any problems with the concept of this approach? This can be It works only on top of a filesystem while all the checkpointing clever stuff is done internally by the DB (infact it _needs_ O_SYNC when it works on the fs). Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/