From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:08:46 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: the new VM Message-ID: <20000927160846.E27898@athlon.random> References: <20000926211016.A416@bug.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:42:45AM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Pavel Machek , Marcelo Tosatti , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Roger Larsson , MM mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:42:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > such screwups by checking for NULL and trying to handle it. I suggest to > rather fix those screwups. How do you know which is the minimal amount of RAM that allows you not to be in the screwedup state? We for sure need a kind of counter for the special dynamic structures but I'm not sure if that should account the static stuff as well. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/