From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:31 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Message-ID: <20000925163331.N22882@athlon.random> References: <20000925145856.A13011@athlon.random> <20000925154952.O26339@suse.de> <20000925162009.K22882@athlon.random> <20000925161134.S26339@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20000925161134.S26339@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:11:34PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Roger Larsson , MM mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > Interesting. I haven't done any serious benching with the CSCAN introduction > in elevator_linus, I'll try that too. Only changing that the performance decreased reproducibly from 16 to 14 mbyte/sec in the read test with 2 threads. So far I'm testing only IDE with LVM striping on two equal fast disks on separate IDE channels. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/