From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 04:02:30 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Message-ID: <20000925040230.D10381@athlon.random> References: <20000925033128.A10381@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 09:27:39PM -0400 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Roger Larsson , MM mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 09:27:39PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > So help testing the patches to them. Arrgh... I think I'd better fix the bugs that I know about before testing patches that tries to remove the superblock_lock at this stage. I guess you should re-read the email from DaveM of two days ago. Then I've a problem: I've no idea how could I test adfs/affs/efs/hfs/hpfs/qnx4/sysv/udf. If you send me by email or point out the URL where I can find the source of the mkfs for all the above fs I will try to add the tests in the regression test suite as soon as time permits so the computer will do that job for me (that will be useful regardless of the super-lock issue). (if the mkfses are in common packages like mkfs.minix and mkfs.bfs no need to send them of course) Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/