From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 02:18:05 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix Message-ID: <20000922021805.D23007@athlon.random> References: <200009212223.PAA04238@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200009212223.PAA04238@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:23:17PM -0700 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "David S. Miller" Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:23:17PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > How did you get away with adding a new member to task_struct yet not > updating the INIT_TASK() macro appropriately? :-) Does it really > compile? As far as sleep_time is ok to be set to zero its missing initialization is right. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/