From: Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>
To: Linux MM mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: How does the kernel map physical to virtual addresses?
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:26:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000825233718Z131190-247+15@kanga.kvack.org> (raw)
When my driver wants to map virtual to physical (and vice versa) addresses, it
calls virt_to_phys and phys_to_virt. All these macros do is add or subtract a
constant (PAGE_OFFSET) to one address to get the other address.
How does the kernel configure the CPU (x86) to use this mapping? I was under
the impression that the kernel creates a series of 4MB pages, using the x86's
4MB page feature. For example, in a 64MB machine, there would be 16 PTEs (PGDs?
PMDs?), each one mapping a consecutive 4MB block of physical memory. Is this
correct? Somehow I believe that this is overly simplistic.
The reason I ask is that I'm confused as to what happens when a user process or
tries to allocate memory. I assume that the VM uses 4KB pages for this
allocatation. So do we end up with two virtual addresses pointing the same
physical memory?
What happens if I use ioremap_nocache() on normal memory? Is that memory
cached or uncached? If I use the pointer obtained via phys_to_virt(), the
memory is cached. But if I use the pointer returned from ioremap_nocache(), the
memory is uncached. My understanding of x86 is that caching is based on
physical, not virtual addresses. If so, it's not possible for a physical
address to be both cached and uncached at the same.
Could someone please straighten me out?
--
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next reply other threads:[~2000-08-25 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-25 23:26 Timur Tabi [this message]
2000-08-28 12:41 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] <20000825233748Z130198-15329+2857@vger.kernel.org>
2000-08-28 12:56 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-08-28 15:12 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000825233718Z131190-247+15@kanga.kvack.org \
--to=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox