From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:58:25 -0700 From: Bill Huey Subject: Re: 2.4.0-t4-vmpatch results Message-ID: <20000814225825.B1022@gnuppy.dt1.sdca.home.com> References: <20000815015108.A28043@khromy.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20000815015108.A28043@khromy.ath.cx>; from khromy@khromy.ath.cx on Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:51:08AM -0400 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: khromy Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:51:08AM -0400, khromy wrote: > I was just testing the 2.4.0-t4-vmpatch patch on test4 and I was very happy > with the performance with everything I was running. I sent Rik the > results of vmstat and some extra information accouple of times durring my > tests along with what I was doing at the time. It was very smooth and > responsive basicly throughout the tests. Er, *insanely smooth* I should add. This fixes alot of the problems that I've (we've) been having with performance issues in the VM system. Whoo Hooo !!! ;-) Riel's kicking butt. > Regards, > khromy bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/