linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>
Cc: Linux MM mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: get_page_map in 2.2 vs 2.4
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:59:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000703145955.C3284@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000630175015Z131177-21002+72@kanga.kvack.org>; from ttabi@interactivesi.com on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:38:19PM -0500

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> 
> In 2.4, it's been changed to this:
> 
> /* 
>  * Given a physical address, is there a useful struct page pointing to
>  * it?  This may become more complex in the future if we start dealing
>  * with IO-aperture pages in kiobufs.
>  */
> 
> static inline struct page * get_page_map(struct page *page)
> {
> 	if (page > (mem_map + max_mapnr))
> 		return 0;
> 	return page;
> }

Yes.  get_page_map() takes a "struct page *" which has been obtained
through some magic pointer arithmetic; we still have to do the bounds
checking to make sure that the resulting pointer pointed to a valid
part of the mem_map array.  The comment about IO aperture memory still
stands, as in the future we may want to support the creation of
additional mem_map arrays at run time to map struct page *'s beyond
the end of physical memory, to allow kiobuf I/O on things like
framebuffers.

> Am I missing something?  What was wrong with the original implementation?

It didn't work on IA32 systems with >=1GB memory.

Cheers,
 Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

      reply	other threads:[~2000-07-03 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-06-30 17:38 Timur Tabi
2000-07-03 13:59 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000703145955.C3284@redhat.com \
    --to=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox