From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>
Cc: Linux MM mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: get_page_map in 2.2 vs 2.4
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:59:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000703145955.C3284@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000630175015Z131177-21002+72@kanga.kvack.org>; from ttabi@interactivesi.com on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:38:19PM -0500
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>
> In 2.4, it's been changed to this:
>
> /*
> * Given a physical address, is there a useful struct page pointing to
> * it? This may become more complex in the future if we start dealing
> * with IO-aperture pages in kiobufs.
> */
>
> static inline struct page * get_page_map(struct page *page)
> {
> if (page > (mem_map + max_mapnr))
> return 0;
> return page;
> }
Yes. get_page_map() takes a "struct page *" which has been obtained
through some magic pointer arithmetic; we still have to do the bounds
checking to make sure that the resulting pointer pointed to a valid
part of the mem_map array. The comment about IO aperture memory still
stands, as in the future we may want to support the creation of
additional mem_map arrays at run time to map struct page *'s beyond
the end of physical memory, to allow kiobuf I/O on things like
framebuffers.
> Am I missing something? What was wrong with the original implementation?
It didn't work on IA32 systems with >=1GB memory.
Cheers,
Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-03 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-30 17:38 Timur Tabi
2000-07-03 13:59 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000703145955.C3284@redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox