From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: lord@sgi.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@conectiva.com.br
Subject: Re: kmap_kiobuf()
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:45:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200006291345.IAA21962@jen.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> of "Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:34:01 BST." <20000629103401.B3473@redhat.com>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 03:16:42PM -0500, lord@sgi.com wrote:
>
> > So we are currently using memory managed as an address space to do the
> > caching of metadata. Everything is built up out of single pages, and when w
e
> > need something bigger we glue it together into a larger chunk of address
> > space.
>
> What do you mean by "address space"? If you mean kernel VA, then
> there's a clear risk of fragmenting the kernel's remappable area and
> ending up unable to find contiguous regions at all if you're not
> careful.
Sorry, I used the same term for two different things there, we cache meta
data in a 'struct address_space', the second one is the problem issue. XFS
is doing 'bad things' with address space remapping to take a handful of
previously existing pages and remapping them to appear as one chunk of
memory. We do not usually have that many in existence at once. I think it
has pretty much been established that this is not going to be acceptable
in the long term - I always knew that was likely.
Running with a bigger PAGE_CACHE_SIZE will help, some of the code in XFS
may be changable to work without treating the metadata object as a single
chunk of memory, and we may be able to come up with some other tricks too.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-29 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-28 20:16 kmap_kiobuf() lord
2000-06-28 21:22 ` kmap_kiobuf() Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
2000-06-29 9:34 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-29 13:45 ` Steve Lord [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-06-28 16:52 kmap_kiobuf() lord
2000-06-28 18:06 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-28 19:06 ` kmap_kiobuf() Manfred Spraul
2000-06-28 21:05 ` kmap_kiobuf() Andi Kleen
2000-06-28 15:54 kmap_kiobuf() lord
2000-06-28 16:06 ` kmap_kiobuf() David Woodhouse
2000-06-28 16:24 ` kmap_kiobuf() Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
2000-06-28 18:07 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-28 18:45 ` kmap_kiobuf() David Woodhouse
2000-06-29 9:09 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-28 17:46 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-28 15:41 kmap_kiobuf() David Woodhouse
2000-06-28 17:44 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-29 10:52 ` kmap_kiobuf() Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200006291345.IAA21962@jen.americas.sgi.com \
--to=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox