From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:57:52 -0500 From: Timur Tabi In-Reply-To: <200006211956.MAA60703@google.engr.sgi.com> References: <20000621195525Z131176-21000+55@kanga.kvack.org> from "Timur Tabi" at Jun 21, 2000 02:48:56 PM Subject: Re: 2.4: why is NR_GFPINDEX so large? Message-Id: <20000621200418Z131176-21004+46@kanga.kvack.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linux MM mailing list List-ID: ** Reply to message from Kanoj Sarcar on Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT) > This is a left over from the days when we had a few more __GFP_ flags, > but that has been cleaned up now, so NR_GFPINDEX can go down. Cool. I'm glad to see that my questions wasn't stupid :-) >Be aware > of any cache footprint issues though. Ok, you just lost me. What's a "cache footprint"? -- Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/