From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 18:04:42 -0500 From: Timur Tabi References: <20000608225108Z131165-245+107@kanga.kvack.org> <20000608235235Z131165-283+94@kanga.kvack.org> In-Reply-To: <20000609232058.C28878@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> References: <20000608235235Z131165-283+94@kanga.kvack.org>; from ttabi@interactivesi.com on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 06:29:07PM -0500 Subject: Re: Allocating a page of memory with a given physical address Message-Id: <20000609230528Z131165-283+98@kanga.kvack.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linux MM mailing list List-ID: ** Reply to message from Jamie Lokier on Fri, 9 Jun 2000 23:20:58 +0200 > Even if you implement that, there will be times when you simply can't > have the page. Sometimes the current owner of the page can't allow it > to be moved. This happens for vmalloc()ed memory and user processes > that that use mlock(). This includes MP3 players and security > products... That's okay. If it page is taken, then the caller will have to deal with it. -- Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/