From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:55:11 +0100 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Subject: Re: O_SYNC patches for 2.4.0-test1-ac11 Message-ID: <20000609225511.H2621@redhat.com> References: <20000609223632.E2621@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from drepper@redhat.com on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:51:18PM -0700 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-fsdevel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, Theodore Ts'o , Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds List-ID: Hi, On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:51:18PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Have you thought about O_RSYNC and whether it is possible/useful to > support it separately? It would be possible and useful, but it's entirely separate from the write path and probably doesn't make sense until we've got O_DIRECT working (O_RSYNC is closely related to that). Cheers, Stephen -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/